Facundo Mena vs Duje Ajdukovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 May at 04:27 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Mena vs D. Ajdukovic

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mena 1 - 0 Ajdukovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Facundo Mena winning 2 and Duje Ajdukovic winning 0. The last match between Facundo Mena and Duje Ajdukovic was at the Zagreb Challenger, 13-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Facundo Mena getting the victory 6-2 7-6(2).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mena | 1 |
| Ajdukovic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Zagreb Challenger(05-13-25)
F. Mena vs D. Ajdukovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $140,110 | Career Prize Money | $334,715 |
| 56.68% (509-389) | Career Total W/L | 58.76% (285-200) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
F. Mena vs D. Ajdukovic Match Preview:
- Second serve effectiveness is almost identical for both players, with Ajdukovic winning 45.45% and Mena 45.67% of their second serve points.
- When it comes to returning the opponent's second serve, Ajdukovic excels with 46.3% success, compared to Mena's 39%.
- First serve return statistics slightly favor Mena, with 26.59% success versus Ajdukovic's 25.43%.
- Does breakpoint saving capability provide an edge? Mena saves 57.53% of breakpoints, outperforming Ajdukovic, who saves 51.79%.
- Assessing overall match performance over the last year, Mena boasts a win rate of 58.93%, ahead of Ajdukovic's 50.94%.
- Ajdukovic performs best on Clay surfaces with a 61% win rate, while Mena excels on Indoor Hard courts with 67% wins.
- In comparison, Mena plays against lower-ranked opponents (average rank 354.52) than Ajdukovic (average rank 222).
- In deciding sets, Mena's winning percentage is 55%, superior to Ajdukovic's 42%, which is crucial in predicting match outcomes.
- Ajdukovic shows slight superiority in breakpoint conversion at 37.68%, compared to Mena's rate of 34.29%.
Editorial Prediction (May 13, 2025, UTC):
Both players have remarkably similar performances when it comes to second serve effectiveness, making this stat less decisive in predicting the match's outcome. However, Ajdukovic appears to have a stronger return game on their opponent's second serve, which could tilt the match in their favor in rallies.
Mena's ability to save breakpoints more effectively suggests they may handle pressure situations better. In overall match performance over the past year, Mena has a higher winning percentage and excels on Indoor Hard surfaces, indicating adaptability and potential advantages in diverse conditions.
Against opponents, Ajdukovic faces stronger competition, possibly impacting their mental and physical resilience. Mena's superior performance in deciding sets suggests better stamina or mental fortitude when matches are intensely competitive.
Taking into account these patterns and statistical nuances, Mena's consistent performance metrics, particularly their match win rate and breakpoint saving proficiency, suggest that they are the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Facundo Mena vs Duje Ajdukovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Mena vs D. Ajdukovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:30:41 | Average Match Time | 1:30:41 |
| 47% (27/57) | 1st Serve % | 75% (51/68) |
| 78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (33/51) |
| 73% (22/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (8/17) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 40% (27/68) | Return Points Win % | 25% (14/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Mena Recent Matches Played
D. Ajdukovic Recent Matches Played

F. Mena vs D. Ajdukovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.68% (509/389) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.76% (285/200) |
| 55.04% (1125/919) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.49% (640/493) |
| 51.49% (9791/9223) | Games Win/Loss | 52.27% (5669/5177) |
| 56.49% (74/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.82% (60/42) |
| 56.73% (430/328) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.74% (198/128) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.35% (25/21) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2682 | Aces Total | 1634 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1523 | Total Double Faults | 1030 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:31:23 |
| 515.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 435.45 |
| 55% (21018/38469) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18830/31065) |
| 70% (14776/21018) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12648/18830) |
| 50% (8791/17451) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5945/12242) |
| 43% (1744/4056) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1475/3284) |
| 41% (16049/39465) | Return Points Win % | 41% (12773/30911) |
| 25.00% (4/12) | Slam W/L | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 26.32% (5/14) | Main Tour W/L | 45.00% (9/11) |
| 51.25% (185/176) | Challenger W/L | 55.56% (140/112) |
| 63.00% (315/185) | Futures W/L | 67.03% (124/61) |
| 57% (505/890) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (282/477) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 57% (154/269) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (77/159) |
| 57% (145/254) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (94/165) |
| 87% (484/423) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (274/233) |
| 12% (484/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (274/40) |
| 21% (414/86) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (211/52) |